Assessing the signiﬁcance of endemic disease in conservation—koalas, chlamydia, and koala retrovirus as a case study
Hamish McCallum1 Douglas H. Kerlin2 William Ellis3 Frank Carrick4
1 Griﬃth School of Environment and Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griﬃth University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
2 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griﬃth University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
3 School of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
4 Koala Study Program, Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
It can be diﬃcult to establish the conservation signiﬁcance of endemic infectious diseases—those that are well established in a population—in contrast with infectious diseases that are still invading. This diﬃculty can have important implications for designing policy to address species declines. The infectious diseases of koalas provide an ideal case study to examine issues involved in identifying the role of endemic disease in conservation biology. Koala populations are in decline, amidst claims for many years that infectious diseases, particularly those with chlamydial etiology, play a key role in this loss. However, weak associations between prevalence of infection, clinical signs of disease, and population decline mean that it remains unclear whether infectious disease is a primary driver of koala population decline. There are multiple causes of koala decline including drought, habitat destruction, and disease. Well designed experiments, linked to appropriate models, are necessary to determine the true role of infectious disease in the current koala population declines and whether a focus on disease is likely to be a feasible, let alone the most cost-eﬀective, means of preventing further declines.